In a popular "Foreign exchange margin transaction (FX)" among the individual investor, furious opposition has occurred to tightening of regulations that Financial Services Agency aims at the implementation from this summer.
It is an aim to limit a trade that gambles and is high to be able to do hundreds of times buying and selling by the countermeasure that reduces the upper limit of "Margin magnification" that shows how many times entrusted money can be dealt with from present unrestricted up to 25 times in stages.
The voice opposite to "The self responsibility is ..investment.. principle" pours in from the trader of FX and the investor.
A situation slight whether there are a lot of negative voices, and advance to the regulation easily also in the Liberal-Democratic Party.
When Yano Econimic Research Institute investigated for about 2700 individual investors in May, the investor of 91% is opposite to the regulation to "20-30 times".
The investor "FX is left" goes up to 22% if executed.
The opinion such as "The magnification was able to be dealt with and to deal with it only by the person who had the low and assets" was sent.
In the FX trade, 50 million yen can be dealt with in case of 2.5 million yen, and 500 times if the magnification is 25 times when the margin of 100,000 yen is entrusted for instance.
The damage grows, too, when the magnification is high and the margin blows off instantaneously.
The margin of the addition might be inserted, and the damage swell fast though the trade is released to compulsory when the damage reaches a constant forehead of the margin and the mechanism of "Loss cutting" that fixes the damage is provided.
Moreover, there is a trader of FX who falls into the operating crisis because of making up for a large sum of damage that the client received by the violent fluctuation of the quotation etc. , too.
Therefore, Financial Services Agency decides tightening of regulations from the standpoint of protection of investors, and is a dissemination lingua in the late-May as for the reduction idea.
Concretely, the repulsion of industry segments is considered, one year is assumed to be keeping things as they are at first, and one year will be reduced to 25 times in 50 times and two years afterwards.
Financial Services Agency..January..go..investigation..FX..trader..adopt..stay..occupy..regulation..execute..greater part of..drastic..magnification..reduce..approach.
Therefore, an opposite voice to "It cannot consent to regulate the whole uniformly" (money Partners) and "It is possible to correspond by the loss cutting rule" (FX prime), etc. gushes from industry segments.
The voice with "It is necessary to avoid an excessive regulation" comes out in the Liberal-Democratic Party.
"Futures trading damage nationwide society" of the attorney tela to work on the investment damage is an assertion without the loss cutting rule's functioning by the system down at the end of May, and enumerating the case where the damage swelled with a large sum etc. against this as for the opinion with "The regulation was too slow". Japan Federation of Bar Associations also is announcing the statement with "Gambling is high, and the regulation is necessary".
Financial Services Agency is a posture that is assumed, "The magnification of the margin trading of the share is about three times high and commodity futures is 10-20 times too higher FX", and forced at first according to the idea.
Though the FX trade to which the high-risk high-return has rapidly expanded by the charm
Well informed attorney Tetsuro Arai about the investment damage is speaking, "The involution Shite squid bamboo basket is not obtained as a money game".
http://sankei.jp.msn.com/economy/finance/090619/fnc0906192140017-n1.htm
Japan is good country!
http://japan-power.net/
PLEASE come here!
It is an aim to limit a trade that gambles and is high to be able to do hundreds of times buying and selling by the countermeasure that reduces the upper limit of "Margin magnification" that shows how many times entrusted money can be dealt with from present unrestricted up to 25 times in stages.
The voice opposite to "The self responsibility is ..investment.. principle" pours in from the trader of FX and the investor.
A situation slight whether there are a lot of negative voices, and advance to the regulation easily also in the Liberal-Democratic Party.
When Yano Econimic Research Institute investigated for about 2700 individual investors in May, the investor of 91% is opposite to the regulation to "20-30 times".
The investor "FX is left" goes up to 22% if executed.
The opinion such as "The magnification was able to be dealt with and to deal with it only by the person who had the low and assets" was sent.
In the FX trade, 50 million yen can be dealt with in case of 2.5 million yen, and 500 times if the magnification is 25 times when the margin of 100,000 yen is entrusted for instance.
The damage grows, too, when the magnification is high and the margin blows off instantaneously.
The margin of the addition might be inserted, and the damage swell fast though the trade is released to compulsory when the damage reaches a constant forehead of the margin and the mechanism of "Loss cutting" that fixes the damage is provided.
Moreover, there is a trader of FX who falls into the operating crisis because of making up for a large sum of damage that the client received by the violent fluctuation of the quotation etc. , too.
Therefore, Financial Services Agency decides tightening of regulations from the standpoint of protection of investors, and is a dissemination lingua in the late-May as for the reduction idea.
Concretely, the repulsion of industry segments is considered, one year is assumed to be keeping things as they are at first, and one year will be reduced to 25 times in 50 times and two years afterwards.
Financial Services Agency..January..go..investigation..FX..trader..adopt..stay..occupy..regulation..execute..greater part of..drastic..magnification..reduce..approach.
Therefore, an opposite voice to "It cannot consent to regulate the whole uniformly" (money Partners) and "It is possible to correspond by the loss cutting rule" (FX prime), etc. gushes from industry segments.
The voice with "It is necessary to avoid an excessive regulation" comes out in the Liberal-Democratic Party.
"Futures trading damage nationwide society" of the attorney tela to work on the investment damage is an assertion without the loss cutting rule's functioning by the system down at the end of May, and enumerating the case where the damage swelled with a large sum etc. against this as for the opinion with "The regulation was too slow". Japan Federation of Bar Associations also is announcing the statement with "Gambling is high, and the regulation is necessary".
Financial Services Agency is a posture that is assumed, "The magnification of the margin trading of the share is about three times high and commodity futures is 10-20 times too higher FX", and forced at first according to the idea.
Though the FX trade to which the high-risk high-return has rapidly expanded by the charm
Well informed attorney Tetsuro Arai about the investment damage is speaking, "The involution Shite squid bamboo basket is not obtained as a money game".
http://sankei.jp.msn.com/economy/finance/090619/fnc0906192140017-n1.htm
Japan is good country!
http://japan-power.net/
PLEASE come here!
はてなに追加
MyYahoo!に追加
del.icio.usに追加
livedoorClipに追加
コメントする